Skip to main content

[Communication] The API for Human Interaction: NVC for Technical Organizations

 If you walk into any technical organization - engineering, data science, cybersecurity, product - you’ll find brilliant people solving incredibly complex problems. They architect systems that scale, debug issues that would make most of us cry, and make decisions that affect millions of users.

And yet, ask these same people what frustrates them most at work, and you’ll rarely hear:

  • “The codebase is too complex.”
  • “The architecture is unclear.”
  • “The algorithm is too hard.”

Instead, you’ll hear:

  • “We don’t communicate well.”
  • “People get defensive.”
  • “We talk past each other.”
  • “Feedback feels personal.”
  • “We keep having the same arguments.”

The real bottleneck in technical organizations isn’t technical. It’s relational.

And this is exactly where Non‑Violent Communication (NVC) becomes one of the most powerful tools a technical team can adopt.

The Hidden Emotional Layer of Technical Work

Technical environments like to pretend they’re purely rational. But anyone who has worked in engineering or any other deep technical environment knows the truth:

  • A code review can feel like a judgment of your intelligence.
  • A last‑minute requirement change can feel like disrespect.
  • A terse Teams/Slack message can ruin your day.
  • A misaligned expectation can derail a sprint.
  • A poorly facilitated meeting can create weeks of tension.

Technical work IS emotional work. We just don’t talk about it.

And because we don’t talk about it, emotions leak out sideways:

  • sarcasm
  • passive‑aggressive comments
  • defensiveness
  • avoidance
  • over‑explaining
  • shutting down

NVC gives teams a structured way to bring clarity, empathy, and intention into conversations that would otherwise spiral.

What NVC Actually Is (and What It Isn’t)

Non‑Violent Communication is not about being “nice.” It’s not about avoiding conflict. It’s not about sugarcoating.

NVC is a framework for honest, clear, respectful communication, especially when the stakes are high.

It has four components:

  1. Observation – What happened, without judgment
  2. Feeling – What emotion the situation triggered
  3. Need – What underlying value or requirement is affected
  4. Request – What specific, actionable change you’re asking for

It sounds simple. But in practice, it’s transformative.

Why Technical Professionals Resist NVC

When I introduce NVC to technical teams, I often hear:

  • “This feels too soft.”
  • “We don’t have time for emotional conversations.”
  • “We’re engineers, not therapists.”

But here’s the irony:

NVC is one of the most structured, logical communication frameworks ever created.

It’s basically an API for human interaction:

  • predictable
  • repeatable
  • debuggable
  • scalable

Once engineers see this, they get it immediately.

The Real Reason NVC Works in Technical Organizations

Technical teams thrive on:

  • clarity
  • precision
  • predictability
  • explicitness
  • well‑defined interfaces

NVC gives you exactly that.

It turns vague emotional reactions into clear, actionable information.

It turns conflict into collaboration.

It turns defensiveness into dialogue.

And it does all of this without requiring people to become more emotional - just more aware.

A Realistic Example: The Code Review That Went Sideways

Let’s take a common scenario.

Situation: A senior engineer leaves blunt comments on a pull request. The junior engineer feels attacked and stops contributing as much.

Typical reaction: “You’re too harsh in code reviews.” “You’re too sensitive.”

Nothing changes.

NVC approach:

  • Observation: “In the last two PRs, the comments were short and direct, without explanations.”
  • Feeling: “I felt discouraged and anxious.”
  • Need: “I need clarity and psychological safety when I’m learning.”
  • Request: “Would you be open to adding a bit more context in your comments so I can understand the reasoning?”

This is not soft. This is clarity.

And clarity is what technical teams crave.

Another Example: The Product Manager Who Keeps Changing Requirements

Typical reaction: “You always change things at the last minute.” “You’re making our work impossible.”

Escalation guaranteed.

NVC approach:

  • Observation: “In the last two sprints, new tasks were added after planning.”
  • Feeling: “I feel overwhelmed.”
  • Need: “I need predictability to deliver quality work.”
  • Request: “Can we agree on a minimum notice period for changes?”

Suddenly, the conversation becomes solvable.

NVC Reduces Defensiveness

Defensiveness happens when people feel:

  • judged
  • blamed
  • misunderstood
  • attacked

NVC removes all four triggers.

It focuses on:

  • facts, not interpretations
  • needs, not accusations
  • requests, not demands

This is why technical teams adopt it so quickly: it removes the emotional noise and leaves the signal.

NVC Makes Technical Teams Faster, Not Slower

One of the biggest misconceptions is that NVC takes too much time.

In reality, it saves time because:

  • fewer misunderstandings
  • fewer escalations
  • fewer rework cycles
  • fewer emotional blowups
  • fewer passive‑aggressive delays

When people feel safe and clear, they move faster.

Psychological safety is not a “nice to have.” It’s a performance multiplier.

How Leaders Can Introduce NVC Without Resistance

1. Model it, don’t mandate it

Engineers don’t adopt frameworks because they’re told to. They adopt them because they see them working.

2. Integrate it into existing rituals

  • code reviews
  • retrospectives
  • 1:1s
  • sprint planning
  • incident postmortems

3. Normalize the language of needs

Technical needs are not fluffy:

  • clarity
  • predictability
  • autonomy
  • efficiency
  • focus

These are engineering values.

4. Practice with real scenarios

Theory doesn’t stick. Real conversations do.

The Future of Technical Work Is Human

As AI takes over more of the purely technical tasks, the differentiator in technical organizations will be:

  • collaboration
  • communication
  • emotional intelligence
  • conflict navigation
  • relational leadership

NVC is not a soft skill. It’s a strategic skill.

It’s the operating system for teams that want to move fast without breaking each other.

And in a world where technology evolves at breakneck speed, the teams who communicate well will be the ones who win.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Getting PMP certified

I've got a lot of friends asking me about how to get certified. Each time, I had to remember how many hours of experience one had to have, and how many hours of learning, and then which where the links that were most useful for me, as well as all the books and software I have ever used. In terms of specific requirements for getting certified, the best resource will always be pmi.org, with a direct link to the requirements: PMI site - Obtaining the Credential . The site lists a credential overview, and then there (currently) 5 handbooks for the 5 available certifications. There is also a page with how to prepare for the exam, from an administrative point of view. If you are new to project management, then you will have to go with the CAPM certification. Then, the rest of certifications are for more and more experienced PMs. I only know well about the PMP certification, as it's the one I've got. First step is to ensure that you meet the elgibility requirements. At the t...

[Goal driven] A technique that has (almost) nothing to do with tomatoes

I know a lot of theory about time management, techniques, ways of organizing yourself and so. And I am sharing my knowledge with others as well. But the most rewarding part comes from actually applying these techniques myself. For example – using the Pomodoro technique has given me the joy of achieving significant progress in just a small amount of time. Imagine a bright red, glossy tomato-shaped kitchen timer sitting on a clean wooden desk. Its rounded surface gleams under soft daylight, with a small green stem on top, mimicking the look of a real pomodoro. Around its circumference, bold white numbers mark the minutes, with a simple arrow indicator showing the current countdown. The timer’s dial is currently set to 25 minutes, signifying the start of a focused work interval. Nearby, a notebook and pen suggest readiness for productivity, while the timer’s classic wind-up mechanism adds a tactile, satisfying element to the scene – a perfect embodiment of the Pomodoro technique in ...

[Management lessons] When the Best Plans Fail: Lessons from a troubled launch

A few months ago, my team was gearing up to launch a new automation tool for case assignment - a project that is key for the future, and also were we spent so much energy into. We spent weeks identifying scenarios, testing in a dev environment, and reflecting on potential issues. We wrote crystal-clear documentation and worked with a rockstar team of developers, testers, and communicators. We thought we had every base covered. But when launch day arrived, chaos ensued. The tool hit snags that never showed up in testing - edge cases we hadn’t anticipated. Worse, some team members seemed blindsided by the changes, despite our efforts to keep everyone in the loop. It was a classic “complex failure,” as Amy C. Edmondson describes in her book Right Kind of Wrong: The Science of Failing Well . Complex failures, Edmondson explains, aren’t the result of one person’s mistake or a single oversight. They happen in intricate systems where multiple factors - technology, human behavior, and unexpe...
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.